Globe editorial: What matters most in the Rogers-Shaw decision: lower wireless prices and better service

المملكة العربية السعودية أخبار أخبار

Globe editorial: What matters most in the Rogers-Shaw decision: lower wireless prices and better service
المملكة العربية السعودية أحدث الأخبار,المملكة العربية السعودية عناوين
  • 📰 globeandmail
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 35 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 17%
  • Publisher: 92%

What matters most in the Rogers-Shaw decision: lower wireless prices and better service

It is now almost 22 months since Rogers announced its $26-billion takeover bid for Shaw – and the fact it’s taken so long to assess the deal is a clear reflection of the precarious state of competition in the telecom business.

That’s why the Rogers’ takeover of Shaw as proposed in early 2021 had an unacceptable flaw: It made no sense that Rogers should scoop up Freedom Mobile. It took a long time – more than a year – for Rogers to acknowledge this reality but it finally did in mid-2022 when it agreed to sell Freedom for $2.85-billion to Quebecor’s Videotron arm, which had a wireless market share of about 20 per cent in Quebec and was looking to expand.

The decision, effectively, is the least-bad outcome. First, Shaw appears to have given up on wireless. The company was late to the market and did not seem keen to invest a lot more money in 5G networks to keep up with the Big Three.

لقد قمنا بتلخيص هذا الخبر حتى تتمكن من قراءته بسرعة. إذا كنت مهتمًا بالأخبار، يمكنك قراءة النص الكامل هنا. اقرأ أكثر:

globeandmail /  🏆 5. in CA

المملكة العربية السعودية أحدث الأخبار, المملكة العربية السعودية عناوين

Similar News:يمكنك أيضًا قراءة قصص إخبارية مشابهة لهذه التي قمنا بجمعها من مصادر إخبارية أخرى.

Federal Court of Appeal sets Jan. 24 for hearing on Rogers-Shaw deal - BNN BloombergFederal Court of Appeal sets Jan. 24 for hearing on Rogers-Shaw deal - BNN BloombergThe Federal Court of Appeal will hear the Competition Bureau's appeal of a decision that cleared the way for Rogers Communication's takeover of Shaw Communications on Jan. 24.
اقرأ أكثر »

Final Rogers-Shaw decision could be a political one, but Conservative stance still unknownFinal Rogers-Shaw decision could be a political one, but Conservative stance still unknownThe final decision on the Rogers\u002DShaw may be a political one, but the Conservative position is still unknown.
اقرأ أكثر »

Opinion: Rogers-Shaw decision sets a worrying precedent for future takeoversOpinion: Rogers-Shaw decision sets a worrying precedent for future takeoversThe Competition Bureau says the Competition Tribunal considered an incorrect version of the deal
اقرأ أكثر »

Final Rogers-Shaw decision could be a political one, but Conservative stance still unknownFinal Rogers-Shaw decision could be a political one, but Conservative stance still unknownThe final decision on the Rogers\u002DShaw may be a political one, but the Conservative position is still unknown.
اقرأ أكثر »

Final Rogers-Shaw decision could be a political one, but Conservative stance still unknownFinal Rogers-Shaw decision could be a political one, but Conservative stance still unknownThe final decision on the Rogers\u002DShaw may be a political one, but the Conservative position is still unknown.
اقرأ أكثر »

Final Rogers-Shaw decision could be a political one, but Conservative stance still unknownFinal Rogers-Shaw decision could be a political one, but Conservative stance still unknownThe final decision on the Rogers\u002DShaw may be a political one, but the Conservative position is still unknown.
اقرأ أكثر »



Render Time: 2025-03-03 21:03:59