Parties considering litigation should always consider how what a judge might say will appear to family, neighbours and friends. Read on.
Play Video
If the person was a terrible worker or lied about something to their employer or was nasty and belligerent or a misogynist or had sexually harassed someone, there’s a strong likelihood that will turn up in the judge’s ruling. After all, the judge is bound to go through the facts of the case in coming to their decision.
That’s because a judge’s findings are deemed, at law, to be accurate and are now part of the public record, accessible to anyone, including future employers. And, unless your name is extremely common, you will be immediately identifiable if your story is covered in the media.Article content
المملكة العربية السعودية أحدث الأخبار, المملكة العربية السعودية عناوين
Similar News:يمكنك أيضًا قراءة قصص إخبارية مشابهة لهذه التي قمنا بجمعها من مصادر إخبارية أخرى.
Howard Levitt: Court rulings can haunt you down the road, even if you winParties considering litigation should always consider how what a judge might say will appear to family, neighbours and friends. Read on.
اقرأ أكثر »
Trudeau asks ministers Jaczek, Fortier to review federal outsourcing contracts with McKinseyOpposition parties have said they will probe increased McKinsey role since Liberals first formed government
اقرأ أكثر »
Trudeau asks two ministers to look into federal contracts given to McKinseyOpposition parties demanding explanations after multiple reports cited significant government contracts going to global consulting firm
اقرأ أكثر »
Bill offers Netanyahu government more sway over top Israeli courtJudicial reforms sought by Netanyahu have stirred worry within Israel and abroad for the country’s democratic health
اقرأ أكثر »
'Incredibly dangerous': Vancouver lawyer sounds alarm on AI use in courtThe new technology is unethical and worrisome according to local expert.
اقرأ أكثر »