Three Supreme Court of Canada decisions released Friday made two things clear.
Play Video
This has been common practice in our courts based on a 1987 Supreme Court decision, in a country where Canadians have been raised on the idea judges decide cases solely on the basis of the facts before them. This practice, which has no equivalent in the U.S., has resulted in decisions where judges have ruled that in the case before them a mandatory minimum sentence was justified, but that in a hypothetical case it would be cruel and unusual punishment and thus not constitutional.Friday involving gun crimes, it rejected the use of hypothetical cases in two lower court rulings, declaring the mandatory minimum sentences imposed were constitutional, and supported it in the third.
المملكة العربية السعودية أحدث الأخبار, المملكة العربية السعودية عناوين
Similar News:يمكنك أيضًا قراءة قصص إخبارية مشابهة لهذه التي قمنا بجمعها من مصادر إخبارية أخرى.
Supreme Court of Canada to rule on constitutionality of mandatory firearm sentencesThe Supreme Court of Canada plans to rule today on the constitutionality of mandatory minimum sentences in cases involving armed robbery and recklessly firing a gun.
اقرأ أكثر »
Michael Higgins: It's time to stop ignoring the Supreme Court on private health careToo many people are suffering and dying on waiting lists.
اقرأ أكثر »
Supreme Court of Canada set to rule on mandatory firearm sentences | Globalnews.caThe Supreme Court of Canada plans to rule Friday on the constitutionality of mandatory minimum sentences in cases involving armed robbery and recklessly firing a gun.
اقرأ أكثر »
Supreme Court of Canada to rule on constitutionality of mandatory firearm sentencesAn Alberta man argued the minimum four\u002Dyear sentence for recklessly discharging a firearm violated the constitutional prohibition on cruel and unusual…
اقرأ أكثر »
Supreme Court of Canada to rule on constitutionality of mandatory firearm sentencesThe Supreme Court of Canada plans to rule today on the constitutionality of mandatory minimum sentences in cases involving armed robbery
اقرأ أكثر »
Michael Higgins: It's time to stop ignoring the Supreme Court on private health careToo many people are suffering and dying on waiting lists.
اقرأ أكثر »