Evidence presented at the Emergencies Act inquiry shows legislation was not supported by advice from Canada’s intelligence agency
Canada’s intelligence agency told the government before it invoked the Emergencies Act that the convoy protests did not meet the national security threat level required to trigger the sweeping powers.on Monday showed that a key reason for using the legislation was not supported by advice from the Canadian Security Intelligence Service. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s government made the unprecedented decision to invoke the act on Feb.
To declare a public order emergency, the Emergencies Act states that there must be “threats to the security of Canada” that are so serious as to be a national emergency. The act’s definition of threats to the security of Canada comes from the CSIS Act. He also told inquiry lawyers that “at no point” did the protests constitute such a threat, according to the interview summary.
المملكة العربية السعودية أحدث الأخبار, المملكة العربية السعودية عناوين
Similar News:يمكنك أيضًا قراءة قصص إخبارية مشابهة لهذه التي قمنا بجمعها من مصادر إخبارية أخرى.
Commission counsel to Justice Paul Rouleau to present new reports at Emergencies Act inquiryThe Rouleau inquiry begins a fourth week of testimony into whether the federal government was justified in resorting to emergency measures to end the “Freedom Convoy” blockades.
اقرأ أكثر »
Federal witnesses begin testimony at Emergencies Act inquiry for the first timeThe public inquiry is hearing from the former deputy minister of public safety about whether the department prepared for the protest’s arrival in Ottawa
اقرأ أكثر »
Ottawa knew most protesters had ‘weak connection to the cause’ days before it invoked Emergencies ActDays before invoking the Emergencies Act, Ottawa heard that very few “Freedom Convoy” protesters felt strongly about the movement’s cause, and leaders might have been encouraged to leave.
اقرأ أكثر »
Opinion: Ten ways to fix the Emergencies ActThere are practical ways to reform the act to ensure that it does not get abused by future governments
اقرأ أكثر »
Rouleau Commission unlikely to change Canadians' minds already made up about Emergencies Act, say expertsAlthough lawmakers have remained relatively quiet as the Public Order Emergency Commission looking into the first-ever invocation of the Emergencies Act continues its work, experts say those Canadians who are paying close attention likely already have a strong opinion as to whether or not the federal government’s use of the legislation was necessary. An astonishing amount of testimony and documents have now been made public, including revelations that Coutts Mayor Jim Willett believed then-Alberta premier Jason Kenney was ignoring the severity of the situation, that Ontario Premier Doug Ford told Prime Minister Justin Trudeau (Papineau, Que.) that he felt Ottawa police and the mayor had mismanaged the protest, and that the RCMP altered security plans for cabinet ministers prior to the arrival of protesters in Ottawa. Ford also launched a successful legal challenge against testifying at the inquiry, where he and his deputy premier Sylvia Jones had been called to appear as witnesses. According to a Nov. 4 Abacus Data poll, about one in five Canadians say they have been following the commission hearing closely, another 50 per cent say “a little,” with 34 per cent not following the proceedings at all. When asked about the federal government’s response to the Ottawa occupation, 63 per cent said the government “made the best choice it could in the circumstances, to use that law to deal with the situation.” Freedom Convoy supporters block Wellington Street near the Senate of Canada building on Feb. 14, 2022 as the convoy’s occupation of downtown Ottawa entered its third week. The Hill Times photograph by Andrew Meade As the committee’s work has progressed, 88 per cent of those supportive of the government’s choice said the inquiry has made them more inclined to think the government had no better choice but to use the law, with 12 per cent saying they are more inclined to think the government made the wrong choice. For those unsupportive, 18 per cent say they are now more i
اقرأ أكثر »